Discuss to what extent you agree or disagree with this statement. What evidence can you bring to support your position?
- (Dante Germino, Machiavelli to Marx: Modern Western Political Thought, p. 32)
I also agree with Germino's second assertion that Machiavelli's treatise on political theory does not ascribe to the theory that only power and brute force matter. In fact, Machiavelli seems to view brute force as a tool and power as the reward of a ruler who appeases his citizens. Machiavelli seems to establish the appeasement and good favor of the citizens to be the prime goal in his practical political theory. He does say that it is better for a ruler to be feared then loved because the people are more inclined to feel obligated to carry out the commands of a man they fear. He seems to stress being feared over being loved simply because a man that is loved is not always respected, but fear always results in respect, hatred, or both. He maintains that it is most important to avoid being hated by one's subjects, so respect is most likely the desired end result. Respect fosters the most loyalty and fear is often the best way to gain respect.
It seems that in Machiavelli's political theory one must sometimes use evil means to obtain and maintain power because people can be evil. One must respond to certain actions with an equal degree or greater degree of force to maintain one's kingdom; this is often viewed as unjust. But it is often necessary according to Machiavelli. Machiavelli also shows that power and brute force are not the only things that matter in politics; but the opinion of the people, as far as their hatred fear or love of the ruler, is paramount.
No comments:
Post a Comment